On 11/29/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/29/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:54:05 -0500, "The Cunctator" cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
If the source is a blog, the reader can supply his judgment in how much credence to give the source
But if the *only* sources are blogs we clearly have a problem.
Why?
Doesn't the "No Original Research" policy say that sources need to be "reliable" sources? I think a blog would be fine, if the author was generally acknowledged to be a reliable reporter on the subject matter. Of course, under such a rule we might have to leave out certain popular newspapers as sources considering their track record of getting things wrong.
Anthony