Daniel R. Tobias wrote:
For your edification and amusement...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dtobias/Why_BADSITES_is_bad_policy
I have been wondering for quite some time why we allow links to various attack sites, so long as they don't attack Wikipedia editors. Either linking to attack sites is bad, and all should be eliminated (I don't support this), or we shouldn't make a special case of sites that attack Wikipedia editors.
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who thinks this way.
-Rich