On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:52:21 +0100, "Oldak Quill" oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
I think I remember participating in a discussion about one such article. Those who were for the existence of the article made the point that "criticism" doesn't necessarily imply that the commentary is negative (although it is often used in this way). Therefore a "Criticism of..." article should cover views both pro- and contra-.
This is fair; perhaps it should be "media discussion of foo" or some such?
Guy (JzG)