On 3/11/08, David Goodman dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
The second would be to make repeated attempts at deletion symmetrical with repeated attempts to re-insert: to require prior permission from a separate process for a second AfD after a keep.
Or at least a general agreement that the second AFD can be speedy-closed if there have been no substantial changes since the first AFD (or if any discernibly negative changes have been reverted/undone, especially if they are the primary reason for the second AFD).
Or maybe if we start viewing repeated nominations (especially by the same user) as prima facie evidence of deletion hunger...
—C.W.