good afternoon,
i m looking for information about Act of political party, especially which concerning of the establisment of the political party in general in Sweden and Denmark.
I am not able to find this data on the website of "Wikipedia", Can you help me please, where i have to look for it?
Thank you very much
Miriam
Please people - enough. This is clearly a misunderstanding, nothing more. Let's let the matter rest.
Theresa
-----Original Message-----
From: Timwi [mailto:timwi@gmx.net]
Sent: 18 March 2004 15:07
To: wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org
Subject: [WikiEN-l] Re: Mediation board
Erik Moeller wrote:
> Yes, I remember that message.
Ah, so you even knew that there was something other than
"deleted"/"yesterday" in the thread.
>>I recognise your hard work Erik, and I recognise your dedication. I
>>never said you did this deletion ill-meaning, not even that it was an
>>error, because I know you did so thinking well. But this post was
>>important, and it was not your to decide it was crap.
>
> Yes, it was.
The more you insist on this, the more I'm worried you might do it again,
which in turn diminuates my trust in you as a moderator. Not that I care
much, since I'm not using the board either, nor am I a mediator, but I
feel that Anthère and the other mediators deserve better treatment for
their work for Wikipedia.
> The message board was my idea, I configured it, I volunteered to maintain
> it. It is completely unfair to attack me for doing what I was supposed to
> do at the time.
I'm pretty sure that I could set up several more of those boards each
day, configure them and even delete a few threads here and there. I
believe it is a much greater step to volunteer to mediate. It's much
more delicate and much less rewarding business.
> What I question is the way you brought this issue to the fore, the public
> message, the "we are being oppressed!" tone, the "this is none of your
> business!" type comments, the "just like with 168" insinuation.
I agree with you that the latter insinuation was inappropriate, but I
already said that. I don't remember seeing the first, and the second one
is entirely correct.
> The next
> time you have an issue with something I do, I would very much appreciate
> it if you would tell me so in private so we can seek a resolution, instead
> of screaming bloody murder without just cause.
As far as I understood this, nobody knew who actually deleted the
thread. It was therefore perfectly justified to post to the mailing
list. Given the frustration and annoyance caused by the thread deletion,
the tone of the posting was perfectly understandable.
> But as a mediator, I really expect more from you
> in terms of interpersonal communication
says the "administrator" of the board who deleted a thread without a
trace of interpersonal communication...
Timwi
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
New suspect pages keep popping up on the The Best and Worst website.
This one has more references to wikipedia staff, this
time for best couple, here:
http://www.bestandworst.com/pages/vote/vote-3718.html
Some of the other nominations on this page are also
very off-colour.
This next one has a unrepeatable title:
http://www.bestandworst.com/pages/vote/vote-7174.html
This also looks suspect, it refers to 'Jimbo and the jetset':
http://www.bestandworst.com/pages/vote/vote-6681.html
This one, with another disgusting title, contains what
seems to be a reference to Zoe, another of Michael's
unfavorites:
http://www.bestandworst.com/pages/vote/vote-5345.html
I also tried to see what other pages Michael had
written besides the one referred to by the anonymous
soul on Jimbo's page.
But, presumably because the site was being moved, the search did not produce any results, even though the
first page lists Michael as its author.
Like I wrote before, some kinds of hatreds run deep..
____________________________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.as…
> I can support something like the three revert
> concept as a guideline,
> but certainly not as a rule, and even less as an
> enforceable rule. We
> need to begin trusting users again. That was a key
> factor in
> Wikipedia's growth. If Wik or some other
> identified person is a
> persistent problem user then let's deal with it
> without inventing more
> new rules to plague the average user. The bad
> characters will more
> likely than not be multiply offensive, and decisons
> can be based on
> weighing a variety of factors rather than literal
> rules.
>
> Once an understanding has been reached, someone with
> the authority needs
> to accept the responsibilities for following
> through.
>
> Ec
I hate to say it but...me too.
Meelar
=====
"If the Democratic policies had been pursued over the last two or three years, the kind of tax increases that both Kerry and [Sen. John] Edwards [D-N.C.] have talked about, we would not have had the kind of job growth we've had."
-- Vice President Cheney, in an MSNBC interview March 2, lending his perspective to the economy's loss of 2.2 million jobs over three years.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
Apparently this was not a copyright infringement, since the webmaster of
the site in question says it's o.k. That's how I read this, anyway, but
someone should follow up?
----- Forwarded message from Royal House of Portugal <webmaster(a)theroyalhouseofportugal.org> -----
From: "Royal House of Portugal" <webmaster(a)theroyalhouseofportugal.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:23:39 +0100
To: <jwales(a)bomis.com>
Subject: a problem about license violation
Dear Mr. Jimmy Wales,
I'm the webmaster of the sites www.realcasaportuguesa.org , www.theroyalhouseofportugal.org , www.iird.org, www.museum-rhp.org and I'm the owner of the all documents and materials in these sites.
I have written in the Wikipedia's links named Maria Pia; House of Bragança and Duca of Bragança but the system has notified me a GFDL license violation. (one of the links is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Braganza)
Please to explain me the resolution to resolve this problem.
Regards
Webmaster of The Royal House of Portugal
----- End forwarded message -----
I was just curious if anyone has made the similarity between the much talked
about Sedna and Nibiru. Seems to me that they have the same liptical orbit
and are due within the next 50 years to pass by the earth.
Also, They say its smaller than pluto. But it IS coming closer, Can they
tell if it is the same density as Earth. I predict it's at least 6 times
denser. Could you please email me a response. I am very interested in this.
V/R
FC3 Delancey
USS KEARSARGE(LHD-3)
C5I/CD
X-7233
"No Act of Kindness, No matter how small, Is ever wasted"
> OPSEC WARNING
>
> <<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>
> 1. Do not discuss ship's schedule, operations, location or any other
> sensitive information.
> 2. All messages to and from the ship are subject to monitoring for
> violations.
> 3. Bandwidth to the ship is limited - minimize message size and avoid
> including the original e-mail when responding.
> 4. Avoid sending file attachments unless for official business.
> 5. Our adversaries work hard to obtain information about the Amphibious
> Task Force.....Don't make it easy for them!!!
>
>
An update on Jesus Chirst:
Jesus Chirst has returned as Plato. He's left a note
on Jimbo's page saying that he did not know of the
offensive names policy, that he's sorry and loves
Jesus, etc.
____________________________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.as…
> That's completely pointless if the user doesn't really care about what
> version a page remains in but enjoys the process of fighting per se. That
> seems to be the case with Wik. He reverts, reverts, reverts, reverts, then
> he even *asks* for protection of the page. As soon as it becomes
> unprotected again, he will continue reverting to his preferred version.
> This happened with [[McFly]] -- I unprotected it three times already, and
> every time Wik came back to revert it almost instantly. It is protected to
> this day. So what are we gonna do -- keep it protected forever? That is an
> unfair punishment of everyone else.
The common theme among malicious users is that they sooner or later
disappear. Sooner or later they will get bored and go away and then
someone will be there and revert their trash. Or they learn the
wikispirit and stop doing malicious things. Meanwhile, there are about
200,000 other articles you and everyone else can edit. As I highly
doubt that you (or anyone except for Anthony himself) are any
interested in [[McFly]] at all.
BL