In a message dated 1/7/2003 10:01:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
cunctator(a)kband.com writes:
> On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 21:20, daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
> >We now have an extensive and linked list of imaginary countries, including
> my
> >personal favorite, "Purple Bunny" (I kid you not). Another link is to the
> >Confederate Online States. Will we have an article for each state in the
> >"confederacy" too? I think this is getting a tad excessive. Anyone else
> think
> >so too?
> >
> My question is, so what? Wikipedia is not paper. If you think it's
> excessive, then don't contribute to it.
>
> The real problem is that most of the entries are being written in CIA
> World Factbook style, not Wikipedia style.
>
I would like to think that we are trying to put together a serious
encyclopedia. It has nothing to do with whether we are paper or not.