Hi Tom -
As someone who's been through the wringers with OSM (as is Paul), I think
taking things with a grain of salt is good advice to follow.
I would, however, not let the hidden gatekeepers scare you off too too
much, depending on what you're interested in. The first reason is that the
"hidden" gatekeepers aren't really that hidden. After a few activities,
you'll know who they are and possibly understand where they're coming from,
even if you disagree. The second reason is that the hidden gatekeeper
dynamic applies more in some areas than others.
There are also a ton of ways to get involved with OSM that don't rely on
interactions with the OSM org at all. Mapbox and Mapzen (RIP), among others
have built on top of the OSM infrastructure and have created amazing
products and deliverables using the greater OSM infrastructure.
Who knows? Maybe there's a way to dig in and have some fun?
I think the real tie between Maps on Wikipedia and OSM is how they might be
able to draw from the same base data. There's a wealth of value in many of
Wikipedia's maps that is trapped in .svg files and no underlying GIS files.
If we can work on that angle, there's value to both communities downstream
from the source data. That's my 2 cents, anyway.
- Jeff
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 5:56 PM, T Fish <tfish(a)guerillero.net> wrote:
I understand that the blog post is part of an
established genre of
break-up posts with your favored FOSS project, so I am taking it with
the appropriate grain of salt. However, I am a full-time cartographer
and the post has dissuaded me from getting involved. The hidden
gatekeepers are especially troubling.
--Tom
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Deborah Tankersley
<dtankersley(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
The server clusters that the WMF uses are on
Wikitech and can be viewed
here:
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Clusters.
Cheers,
Deb
--
deb tankersley
Program Manager, Engineering
Wikimedia Foundation
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Paul Norman <penorman(a)mac.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/23/2018 10:32 AM, Stefano wrote:
>>
>> Related to this,
>> I wondered if the WMF could be interested in this request for support
>>
>>
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/02/19/osmf-request-
for-proposals-data-centre-2018/
>
>
> One of the core requirements is the data centre is in the EU, for three
> reasons, and I believe the WMF is entirely in North America.
>
> 1. The privacy implications of leaving the EU are complex.
>
> 2. This is a data centre move, not starting a new site. Customs charges
> and the difficulty of physically moving the servers are likely to make
> outside the EU expensive and very complicated
>
> 3. Ping requirements require the site to be in Europe, or near it. A new
> site wouldn't have this constraint, as it could serve a different role,
but
> this site needs good connectivity for
cross-datacentre failover.
>
> If the WMF were interested in supporting with hardware or rack space,
I'm
> sure the OWG would be interested.
>
> The problem is likely to be having hardware in the production network
not
> administered by WMF operations.
>
> OSM's biggest need is for human resources, not computer ones. On the
> technical side, developers helping with code, people writing
documentation,
etc. On
the non-technical side, people who can write helping out OSMF's
Communications Working Group, and other people bringing the skills they
have.
_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
Maps-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
Maps-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
_______________________________________________
Maps-l mailing list
Maps-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
--
Jeff Meyer
206-676-2347
osm: Open Historical Map (OHM)
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map> / my OSM user page
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer>
t: @OpenHistMap