Hi Marcin,
Marcin Cieslak wrote:
Ah, I forgot one things.
I'd like to see how IP failover may work for us in practice (I am thinking between easy switch between ptolemy and cassini in case of some PostgreSQL problems).
(10) Do you mind allocating us one more virtual IPv4 address that will be shared between cassini and ptolemy (for now)? This leads up to:
I addressed this in my previous mail.
(11) I would like to use generate multicast traffic between OSM servers. I think it would be good to have few IP addresses from the 239.192.0.0/14 range allocated.
Well... we do use multicast a bit. We can indeed allocate IPs for you, out of our AS-allocated range. However, Switches/routers handle multicast traffic specially, have group/port membership limits for them and we've also found several bugs. So before you start using it heavily, I'd like to know what for. :) With only 2 servers communicating, would unicast not be a better idea?
Let me know,