From what i gathered from our conversation earlier, XAPI's index is too large
for Cassini. It would have to go on the main server. I propose to talk to Sven and Jens about it. Or what do you mean by "a mirror of the API"?
-- daniel
80n schrieb:
What would a mirror of the database be used for? A mirror of the API, which is what XAPI provides would perhaps be more useful.
Is there a list of proposed applications? The only one I know of is query-to-map.
80n
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com mailto:avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Daniel Kinzler<daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de <mailto:daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de>> wrote: >> With regards to cassini (the toolserver) it now has a free 345 GB /sql >> partition. We could wait for the main osm-db server to be set up and >> set up replication there, or set up cassini as a stand-alone server >> which could be moved to replication later. >> >> When can we expect the main osm-db to be online? And did anyone who's >> more familiar with setting up osm replication than me volunteer to set >> it up already? > > Originally, no replication was planned. Would the space even be sufficient? Maybe:) This is the current space the DB is taking @ OSM: http://pastebin.com/f39a15e34 Maybe a Planet.osm import is smaller than that though. I could check and see if it fails. I was under the impression that replication was planned so that users on the osm-ts would have access to the DB without hammering the main DB (which would be there for production tools) with expensive queries. Or so I gathered from our talk on IRC on the toolserver channel, but may have misunderstood you. _______________________________________________ Maps-l mailing list Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l
Maps-l mailing list Maps-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/maps-l