Bartosz, I think you and I are on the same page here. Shahyar agreed we'd proceed as-designed and do some iterative testing. Does that sound right Shahyar? If you have the time, to implement both styles we could do split testing with both via usertesting.com
*Jared Zimmerman * \ Director of User Experience \ Wikimedia Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmermanhttps://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Shahyar Ghobadpour < sghobadpour@wikimedia.org> wrote:
It's less for drawing attention to it, but rather to make the action itself clear on hover and focus. In an inactive state, it has a toned down style to avoid unnecessarily attracting eyes to non content areas.
--Shahyar On Apr 5, 2014 1:49 PM, "Bartosz Dziewoński" matma.rex@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:30:07 +0200, Shahyar Ghobadpour < sghobadpour@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Non-primary buttons will often still have context (eg. destructive for
"Discard"). We'd like to allow these to remain, without overly drawing away from the primary action.
I think this would be overengineered. The non-primary button should be just that - a dimmed, non-colored non-primary button. We shouldn't draw attention to it with colors.
-- Matma Rex
Design mailing list Design@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
Design mailing list Design@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design