Bartosz, I think you and I are on the same page here. Shahyar agreed we'd proceed as-designed and do some iterative testing. Does that sound right Shahyar? If you have the time, to implement both styles we could do split testing with both via usertesting.com



Jared Zimmerman  \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation               
M : +1 415 609 4043 |   :  @JaredZimmerman



On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Shahyar Ghobadpour <sghobadpour@wikimedia.org> wrote:

It's less for drawing attention to it, but rather to make the action itself clear on hover and focus. In an inactive state, it has a toned down style to avoid unnecessarily attracting eyes to non content areas.

--Shahyar

On Apr 5, 2014 1:49 PM, "Bartosz Dziewoński" <matma.rex@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:30:07 +0200, Shahyar Ghobadpour <sghobadpour@wikimedia.org> wrote:

Non-primary buttons will often still have context (eg. destructive for "Discard"). We'd like to allow these to remain, without overly drawing away from the primary action.

I think this would be overengineered. The non-primary button should be just that – a dimmed, non-colored non-primary button. We shouldn't draw attention to it with colors.

--
Matma Rex

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design