Please participate in the discussion about the "Creation and renewal of
the Committee" section. This is not to approve it yet, just a discussion:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#.22Creation_and_r…
Most of this text has been around for a while, but I made a few changes
to the draft last week, so I wanted to give people an opportunity to
comment, suggest changes, etc.
I'll give it a few more days, then start the formal approval discussion.
Thanks,
Matt Flaschen
Hello volunteer developers & technical contributors!
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want
to know how well we are supporting your contributions on and off wiki, and
how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you
share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia
Foundation. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia
T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is
available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
Use this link to take the survey now:
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_6mTVlPf6O06r3mt&Aud=DEV&Src=DEV
You can find more information about this project here[3]. This survey is
hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement[4].
Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information
about this survey[5]. If you need additional help or have questions about
this survey, send an email to surveys(a)wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
Edward Galvez
Survey Specialist, Community Engagement
Wikimedia Foundation
[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia
Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
[2]Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to
participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New
Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void
where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
[3] About this survey:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_
Insights/About_CE_Insights
[4] Privacy statement: https://wikimediafoundation.
org/wiki/Community_Engagement_Insights_2016_Survey_Privacy_Statement
[5] FAQ:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Engagement_
Insights/Frequently_asked_questions
Hello
for the Articel site I will give you a new and old idea.
On all websites we see menues on top.
But not here .
How can youchange this?
Yes ;-) make a top menue where its wanted and needed.
eg a sub-menu "references"
"dialogs" "words"
for all "important short sentences a polititian told us "
sometimes we find somehwere in longt text sites
....
but not ordered on one site...
the references on bottom are ok, but the main text is mixed with
doing and telling etc....
I think the words and speaches of a person should be on a sub site
and with this order:
Articel________________________________________________________-
____SubMenue__Speaches__Pressarticles__
__________________________________________________________
2016-12-03
"He said that........."
(reference:.....)
__________________________________________________________
So we get a ordered overview of many things as
I red many articles which are not ordered
in time line.
and mixed in i very wild style....
wanna do this or not ?
you can make this automatically ,
If someone writes it o the main site
there can be a button-option to copy it to the sub site with date and
"ref" and he has not to make a new entry.
tell me your idea.
I can write your sponsors if you want ;-)
Obama , no problem....
Regards
Toni
Hello
please explain me why nobody want to change the layout
to the better on like on EN Sites
with a right coloumn and more short infos for persons and parties etc....??
who decides this ?
why is there notz a simple voting or switch
to chnange the layout??
???
here better:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern
here bader :
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel
Regards
Toni
Hello
please explain me why nobody want to change the layout
to the better on like on EN Sites
with a right coloumn and more short infos for persons and parties etc....??
who decides this ?
why is there notz a simple voting or switch
to chnange the layout??
???
here better:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern
here bader :
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angela_Merkel
Regards
Toni
In the great scheme of overall progress, we should delete it – together
with all references on mediawiki.org.
Only opposing thought is, that we won't have one public place to refer to
the mediawiki.UI elements (ok, after the current instance isn't running any
more we don't have one right now either). I'm thinking about discussing
changes to align the remaining elments with OOjs UI.
Best,
Volker
PS: I've also added a comment on the task, we should continue discussion
there.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Wes Moran <wmoran(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> That is certainly one way to reduce the amount of style guides :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Flaschen <mflaschen(a)wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Can we delete mwui.wmflabs.org? Please see
>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T154616 .
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt Flaschen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Design mailing list
>> Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
>
>