The site I suggest we target is Getty images.
http://www.gettyimages.com/
Try their search with an image in mind, like "black child reading a book".
There is no reason we can't do even better than they do. The software
isn't even hard, we just need to make a commitment to doing tagging
right and doing it diligently.
On 8/12/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/08/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As far as your average
Internet user is concerned we are competing with google images.
Somewhat tricky.
Not really - Google Images' search sucks as well - try using it a lot
and see what I mean. Their text search of the web is fantastic, but
their image search is crappy.
With tagging, etc., Commons can do a hell of a lot better.
- d.
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l