The screenreader case seems like even more reason to have it be a
image/button with descriptive alt text rather than relying on what a
particular piece of screen reader software said an extended character
should represent, since we're using it for something different.
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation
M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Matthew Flaschen
<mflaschen(a)wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:37 AM, Steven Walling wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2013, Brion Vibber wrote:
I would strongly consider totally redoing how references are
displayed to use a popup light box with citation cut n paste tools.
No caret or arrow needed for return in this situation... :)
-- brion
Yeah having to scroll up and down the page at all is bad.
For reference here ;) I think enwiki has solved this problem partially
with Yair Rand's Reference Tooltips.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reference_Tooltips
<http://m.mediawiki.org/wiki/Reference_Tooltips>
Popups also has this. I like the idea of putting something like this in
the Cite extension (where the referencing functionality lives), either
immediately or as a Beta feature.
However, it's critical that we don't make accessibility worse. Some
screen readers support JavaScript and CSS, but not all, and we need to make
sure everyone can still read our references.
As Nick said, testing with the print stylesheets is also important.
Matt Flaschen
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design