On 8/4/07, Nilfanion <nilfanion(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Of course, the other issue is CC licenses are
confusing enough as it is.
This seems to suggest that Commons endorses the non-commercial license in
some sense.
This license combination seems to be created solely to make commercial use
as hard as possible whilst salving the uploader's conscience that it is
still "free" (as it is technically...). If we just retag them to GFDL and
move on would there be an issue?
Yes it could potentially be a violation of the terms of the GFDL
(preserve all copyright notices).
Trying to get the FSF to fix the GFDL or the GSFDL
http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/gfdl-draft-1.html
http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/gsfdl-draft-1.html
Would probably be a better aproach if you think there is a reasonable
chance they might do so.
--
geni