"They have exactly zero credibility. Because there is no fact-checking, anybody can go in and put in whatever they want." -- James Pendleton, spokesperson for Senator Conrad Burns, about the Wikinews investigation into staff edits of Burns' Wikipedia article
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2006/02/09/news/wikipedia.txt
Erik Moeller wrote:
"They have exactly zero credibility. Because there is no fact-checking, anybody can go in and put in whatever they want." -- James Pendleton, spokesperson for Senator Conrad Burns, about the Wikinews investigation into staff edits of Burns' Wikipedia article
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2006/02/09/news/wikipedia.txt
<grin> Quite so. If the Reporter had not gotten our relationship with Wikipedia so dreadfully wrong, I might be insulted.
Amgine
Well, based on recent events, I'd say we have more credibility then he does. ~~~~
On 09/02/06, Amgine amgine@saewyc.net wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
"They have exactly zero credibility. Because there is no fact-checking, anybody can go in and put in whatever they want." -- James Pendleton, spokesperson for Senator Conrad Burns, about the Wikinews investigation into staff edits of Burns' Wikipedia article
http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2006/02/09/news/wikipedia.txt
<grin> Quite so. If the Reporter had not gotten our relationship with Wikipedia so dreadfully wrong, I might be insulted.
Amgine
Wikinews-l mailing list Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l
-- - bawolff Caution: The mass of this product contains the energy equivalent of 85 million tons of TNT per net ounce of weight.
wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org