Well, based on recent events, I'd say we have more credibility then he does. ~~~~<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 09/02/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Amgine</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:amgine@saewyc.net">amgine@saewyc.net
</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Erik Moeller wrote:<br>&gt; &quot;They have exactly zero credibility. Because there is no
<br>&gt; fact-checking, anybody can go in and put in whatever they want.&quot;<br>&gt; -- James Pendleton, spokesperson for Senator Conrad Burns, about the<br>&gt; Wikinews investigation into staff edits of Burns' Wikipedia article
<br>&gt;<br>&gt; <a href="http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2006/02/09/news/wikipedia.txt">http://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/articles/2006/02/09/news/wikipedia.txt</a><br><br><br>&lt;grin&gt; Quite so. If the Reporter had not gotten our relationship with
<br>Wikipedia so dreadfully wrong, I might be insulted.<br><br>Amgine<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Wikinews-l mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org">Wikinews-l@Wikimedia.org
</a><br><a href="http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l">http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>- bawolff<br>Caution: The mass of this product contains the energy equivalent of 85 million tons of TNT per net ounce of weight.