To me "...the need for a non-public space for Wikinews to develop
stories..." == embargo wiki, which was proposed and voted on etc (with
concencuss to create), and than not created. (see wc)
-bawolff
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Wikinewsie: Anonymous101 <
wikinewsie.anonymous101(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Quote from previous email on mailing list:
"...the need for a non-public
space for Wikinews to develop stories..."
Isn't this going completely against the idea of a wiki? Should we really
stop people from seeing the development process for the majority of our
users. To me this just seems like a way to allow us to censor articles
without anyone noticing.
I am concerned that Wikimedia is going to start censoring all our articles.
This sort of thing, along with Wikinews:WMF Reports is what is going to stop
us being unbiased.
Thanks,
Anon101
_______________________________________________
Wikinews-l mailing list
Wikinews-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l