To me &quot;...the need for a&nbsp;non-public space for Wikinews to develop stories...&quot; == embargo wiki, which was proposed and voted on etc (with concencuss to create), and than not created. (see wc)<br>-bawolff<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Wikinewsie: Anonymous101 &lt;<a href="mailto:wikinewsie.anonymous101@googlemail.com">wikinewsie.anonymous101@googlemail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Quote from previous email on mailing list: &quot;...the need for a&nbsp;non-public space for Wikinews to develop stories...&quot;<br><br><br>Isn&#39;t this going completely against the idea of a wiki? Should we really stop people from seeing the development process for the majority of our users. To me this just seems like a way to allow us to censor articles without anyone noticing.<div>

<br>I am concerned that Wikimedia is going to start censoring all our articles. This sort of thing, along with&nbsp;Wikinews:WMF Reports is what is going to stop us being unbiased.<br><div><br>
</div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Anon101</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wikinews-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org">Wikinews-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br>