WikimediaPT January 2012

wikimediapt@lists.wikimedia.org

5 participants
6 discussions

Sugestão de melhoria da info
by goncalves.cmc＠sapo.pt 29 Jan '12

29 Jan '12

Na lista das Catedrais de Portugal vem indicada a de Portalegre e não é indicada também a Sé Concatedral de Castelo Branco. Não há bispo de Portalegre e sim de Portalegre e Castelo Branco, existindo por isso duas sés Concatedrais (Portalegre e Castelo Branco). Melhores cumprimentos Carlos Gonçalves.

1 0

Re: [wikimedia-pt] [Wikimania-l] Call for Participation - Wikimania 2012
by Béria Lima 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

FW on request. _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 18 January 2012 17:07, Tiffany Smith <tiffany.lmb.smith(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Call for Participation - Wikimania 2012 > > To submit a proposal, visit: > http://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions > > Important Dates > Deadline for submitting proposals: 18 March 2012 > Notification of acceptance: 8 April 2012 > > Overview > Wikimania conferences provide unique opportunities for the wiki > community and its sister projects (including Wikipedia, Wikibooks, > Wikinews, Wiktionary, Wikispecies, Wikimedia Commons, and Wikimedia) > to come together, share their common goals, and develop better ways to > work together on an international level. The Wikimania 2012 program > structure is designed to create multiple opportunities for conference > participants to actively engage with the subject matter, the > environment, and, most importantly, each other. Washington, D.C, can > play an important role in Wikimania 2012 as a locale that gathers > interest in government, culture, media, and academia around the > general goals of the Wikimania conference series. > > In accordance with these goals and themes, the program will include > traditional conference offerings such as paper presentations, > tutorials, panels, and poster sessions; provide lounge space and > breaks throughout for participants to gather; and innovate with an > unconference day for attendees to design their own schedule and > participation around common interests. Submissions will be reviewed > and selected in advance by the program committee. Attendees are > welcome to present in the open space track of the conference, > regardless of whether their submitted presentations were accepted. > > The eigth annual Wikimania will be held between 12th and 14th July, > 2012 in Washington D.C. For more information, please visit the main > site. > > Presentation length > Due to the extensive amount of program submissions received in the > previous years, we request your presentation be a maximum of 25 > minutes, including time for questions. You may request more time, > though shorter individual presentations are more likely to be > accepted. > > This does not apply for keynote speakers, panels, or workshops. 70 > minute presentations must be submitted either as panel presentations > to include at least three presenters or as workshops with a clear > lesson plan. > > Tracks > Tracks are used by Wikimania to organize submissions and diversify > audiences so that presentations of competing interest do not have time > conflicts. Five tracks are proposed: > > Wikis and the Public Sector > The Washington, DC, location for Wikimania 2012 provides a special > opportunity for those working in the social good, policy, government, > nonprofit, and disaster response arenas to share their experience with > collaboration on a local, national, or international level. Wikis and > complementary technologies are proving to be critical in times of > crisis and in ongoing work with citizen participation in government, > as well as in long-term goals for education, public policy, social > entrepreneurship, and development in the global south and throughout > the world. This track will explore the ways that Wikimedia projects > and related activities can be used to support citizens worldwide. > > GLAM: Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums > This track aims to support current outreach to Galleries, Libraries, > Archives, and Museums and build enthusiasm for continued work in this > area. Presentations and panels will demonstrate effective outreach > techniques and results from ongoing activities as well as envision the > future path for these efforts. Topics of particular interest to this > track may include: wiki technology as a tool for cultural > preservation; use of wikis by museums and libraries for information > management for the public good; legal and copyright issues; use of > content in GLAM projects, education, journalism and research; > conflicts between different laws that apply to the same wiki system > simultaneously. This track may also incorporate “field trips” before, > after, or during the evenings of the conference to visit Washington, > D.C., organizations. > > WikiCulture and Community > Why do people contribute to Wikimedia projects? How might the > community grow and expand while retaining its inherent cultural ethos? > This track will explore the sociology of wiki culture and community > and provide a forum for practitioners and researchers to share > insights and best practices for community management, engagement, > participation, and conflict resolution. The assessment of different > wiki cultures and demonstration of clashes and effects of those > interactions between wiki communities and chapters is relevant to this > track. A special focus will be a discussion of gaps between different > community groups, most notably related to gender and age; within this > context, submissions related to female and teenage participation, > representative roles within the community, and the use of wikis as a > tool for different gender and age group dialogues, are strongly > encouraged. > > Research, Analysis, and Education > The scope of research and analysis on wikis has grown significantly in > recent years, and wikis are rapidly being introduced to educational > institutions in the course of teaching and more formally through the > Campus Ambassador Program. The scholarly atmosphere of the selected > venue creates a special opportunity for researchers working in this > area to present papers and panels to a well-informed audience. > Subjects associated with the research component of this track can > include a diverse range of topics including: technical development, > philosophy and the humanities, communications, community management > and collaboration, information science, and a broad range of other > areas. The practitioner side of this track can include: expert > participation and inviting expert contributions; Wikiversity and other > higher education wikis; wiki sources deployed and implemented in > academia and research practice; approaches to the improvement of > collaboration in research institutions and universities; and > contribution to content quality, among other areas. > > Technology and Infrastructure > Technology and infrastructure play essential roles in the success of > Wikimedia projects and other uses of wiki technology. This track will > incorporate research and practice to showcase technology applications > and theories, demonstrate new uses of existing and evolving > technologies, and focus on applying technologies to meet user needs > and improve the overall user experience. Issues and areas particularly > of note in this track include: OTRS, MediaWiki development, semantic > wikis, wiki-based Augmented Reality (AR), the use of QR codes, > Wikipedia on mobile devices, Wikipedia offline, User Interface Design, > WikiLove, Liquid Thread and related technical focus points. > > Lounge Space Presentations > All proposals and presentations will be welcome in the Lounge space of > the conference, whether or not they are accepted in this initial > process. > > If you have any questions, please contact: > > Tiffany Smith > Program Committee Chair, Wikimania 2012 > tiffany.lmb.smith(a)gmail.com > > Thank you very much for your consideration, and we look forward to > seeing you at Wikimania 2012 in Washington, DC. > > http://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > Wikimania-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l >

1 0

Re: [wikimedia-pt] A Wikipédia em inglês apaga-se no dia 18 de janeiro em protesto contra os projetos de lei SOPA e PIPA
by André Barbosa 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

É possível que alguém crie uma página informativa na wikimedia.pt, para irmos fazendo um logo dos acontecimentos e cobertura de imprensa? Posso fazer o apanhado das notícias que vão saindo, e a página pode ser usada como "portal" do que vai acontecendo. No dia 17 de Jan de 2012 23:37, "Waldir Pimenta" <waldir(a)email.com> escreveu:

4 5

A Wikipédia em inglês apaga-se no dia 18 de janeiro em protesto contra os projetos de lei SOPA e PIPA
by Béria Lima 18 Jan '12

18 Jan '12

Post no blog da WMPT ( http://blog.wikimedia.pt/?p=143 ) > *No dia 18 de janeiro, numa decisão sem precedentes, a comunidade > wikipédica decidiu “apagar” a Wikipédia em inglês durante 24 horas em > protesto contra os projetos de lei norte-americanos “Stop Online Piracy > Act <http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act>” (SOPA), do > Congresso, e PROTECTIP <http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/PROTECT_IP_Act>(PIPA), do Senado. Sendo aprovadas, estas leis prejudicariam gravemente a > Internet livre e aberta e instaurariam novas ferramentas de censura de > sítios da Internet nos Estados Unidos.* > > *Os administradores da Wikipédia em inglês confirmaram esta decisão da > passada segunda-feira através de um anúncio público<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action#Summary_and_c…> > :* > > *No decurso das últimas 72 horas, mais de 1800 wikipedistas uniram-se > para debater medidas que a comunidade poderia tomar contra os projetos de > lei SOPA e PIPA. Esta foi, de longe, a discussão comunitária com o maior > índice de participação jamais visto na Wikipédia, o que ilustra bem o nível > de preocupação que sentem os wikipedistas perante estes projetos de lei. A > imensa maioria dos participantes apoiou uma ação comunitária que > encorajasse uma maior reação pública em resposta a estes projetos de lei. > Das propostas consideradas pelos wikipedistas, as que resultaram num apagão > (blackout) da Wikipédia em inglês, em simultâneo com apagões similares > noutros sítios da web que também recusam estes projetos de lei, foram as > que obtiveram um maior apoio.* > > *“Hoje os wikipedistas de todo o mundo expressaram o seu repúdio por esta > legislação destrutiva”, afirmou Jimmy Wales, fundador de Wikipédia. “Esta é > uma ação extraordinária que a nossa comunidade está a tomar. Apesar de > lamentarmos ter de barrar o acesso à Wikipédia, nem que fosse por um > segundo, simplesmente não podemos ignorar o facto de que os projetos de lei > SOPA e PIPA fazem perigar a liberdade de expressão, tanto nos Estados > Unidos como fora, e estabelecem para o mundo um espantoso precedente de > censura na Internet.”* > > *Incentivamos os leitores da Wikipédia a fazerem ouvir a sua voz. Se vive > nos Estados Unidos, procure o seu representante eleito em Washington. Se > vive fora dos Estados Unidos, contacte o Ministério dos Negócios > Estrangeiros, o Departamento de Estado ou a instituição governamental > similar. Diga-lhes que repudia os projetos de lei SOPA e PIPA e que deseja > que a Internet continue sendo aberta e livre.* > > *(Tradução para português do comunicado em inglês<http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/English_Wikipedia_to_go_…>da Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.) > * > _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>*

2 1

Re: [wikimedia-pt] [Wikimediaindia-l] [Press]: The Indian Express : "Would Gandhi have been a Wikipedian?"
by Béria Lima 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

Artigo em Inglês (se alguem quiser traduzir seria otimo e eu prometo colocar a tradução no blog da WMPT :) ) _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 17 January 2012 04:08, CherianTinu Abraham <tinucherian(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > *The Indian Express : "Would Gandhi have been a Wikipedian?"* > ( Article by Achal Prabhala) > > > http://www.indianexpress.com/news/would-gandhi-have-been-a-wikipedian/90050… > > > http://www.indianexpress.com/news/would-gandhi-have-been-a-wikipedian/90050… > ( Single Page Version) > * > In 1941, a young Argentinian librarian who would soon go completely blind > published a story about the futility of the “total” library. His > inspiration was Kurd Lasswitz, a 19th century German philosopher and > science-fiction pioneer, whose own idea of a “universal” library was a > mathematical nightmare of frighteningly large but finite proportions. The > writer was Jorge Luis Borges, and his story, The Library of Babel, (taking > off from the mythical Tower of Babel, a place of linguistic dysfunction) > spawned a minor publishing industry of its own. Borges’ library was not a > happy place: its chronically overworked librarians were suicidal, thuggish > cults periodically vandalised the books, people spent lifetimes searching > for a catalogue without success, and — wondrous as it all was — no one > expected to find anything useful there ever. > > Eighty years after it was written, Borges’ feverish fantasy is a > cautionary tale for those who are tempted to take Internet-era fantasies at > their word. When a Google executive was asked to describe the perfect > search engine, he is reported to have said, “It would be like the mind of > God.” Preposterous, yes; but also exciting. And anyone excited enough to > adopt this as a mission statement would do well to have a cold shower, and > heed Borges’ conclusion on the topic — “The library is unlimited and > cyclical”. > > Happily, there are more human, and altogether more humble manifestations > of the desire to learn and share and prosper. In ancient history, the > pre-biblical city of Babylon was a working counterpoint to the biblical > Tower of Babel; a bustling site where diverse crowds made good together. In > the present day, we are no closer to knowing everything, but we have > Wikipedia: a bustling website where diverse people from everywhere in the > world create miracles. Wikipedia’s humility is the flip-side to its > success, and it comes from wanting to be precisely the opposite of the > total library: call it a perpetually partial library, if you will. No one > who has spent even a minute contributing anything to it would dare assume > that the job is done, the perspective complete, or the game won. > > Eleven years ago to this day, Jimmy Wales typed out “Hello world!” and > Wikipedia was born. In 1989, Richard Stallman pioneered a form of copyright > licensing for software that allowed programmers and users to do virtually > anything they liked with it. This formed the basis for free and open source > software, or FOSS. In 1995, Ward Cunningham used FOSS to build the > underlying software for a novel form of collaboration — the “wiki”. By this > time, the benefits of a generous copyright licence to software were > apparent, and it was extended to mainstream culture — to words, sounds and > images. Wikipedia was among the early exponents of this free culture > experiment, quickly followed by sister projects of the Wikimedia > Foundation: Wikimedia Commons, Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikibooks and more. > > Wikipedia’s collaborative system of knowledge has exceeded everyone’s > wildest expectations. Today, it is the world’s fifth most visited website — > and the sole non-profit upstart in the oligarchical fiefdom that is our > online landscape. There are thriving communities of volunteers in countries > like India and South Africa, among several other places, who are helping us > discover that learning does not have to be a passive act, and that the > value of generosity can be productive and revolutionary at once. > > Interestingly enough, it was about a hundred years ago that a young, > idealistic lawyer set off on a similar journey. Affected by colonialism in > his home, India, and faced with debilitating segregation laws in his > adopted home, South Africa, he saw the productive and revolutionary > potential in generous knowledge. Over a long sea journey from London to > Cape Town, he wrote down his ideas on self-determination and independence. > The young lawyer was, of course, Gandhi, and his book, Hind Swaraj, would > go on to become the intellectual blueprint for the Indian freedom movement. > The original was written in Gujarati in 1909. One year later, it was > translated into English and published as Indian Home Rule. On the cover of > the first edition of this English translation is a prominent, if unusual, > copyright legend. It reads, “No Rights Reserved”. > > Now it can be told: Gandhi was a free knowledge activist. Consider what he > was encouraging his readers to do. In short order, a person reading Indian > Home Rule in 1910 would have been able to copy the book freely, distribute > those copies widely, translate the book into other languages, and join the > conversation as a participant and not merely as an observer. I know of > Gandhi’s radical copyright intentions because I’ve seen an image of the > cover of this rare first edition, even though it is mostly unavailable in > museums and archives. Uma Dhupelia-Mesthrie and Isabel Hofmeyr, two South > African scholars, photographed the book and generously shared it with the > world. And how did they do that? By putting it on Wikimedia Commons, where > anyone can use it, in any form, for all time — exactly as Gandhi intended. > Indeed, the universe is cyclical. Gandhi would have been a Wikipedian. > > Prabhala is a Bangalore-based researcher and writer, and serves on the > advisory board of the Wikimedia Foundation * > > Regards > Tinu Cherian > press(a)wikimedia.in > http://wiki.wikimedia.in/In_the_news > > Important Note : The publisher ( The Indian Express ) of the above news > article owns the copyrights of the article / content. Request to kindly not > reproduce or circulate the content further. The information is only shared > only with an internal community who have been featured on this article. > All copyrights are duly acknowledged. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaindia-l mailing list > Wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaindia-l > >

1 0

Re: [wikimedia-pt] [Foundation-l] Wikimania 2013 - Announcement of Jury and invitation to bid
by Béria Lima 13 Jan '12

13 Jan '12

Para conhecimento. _____ *Béria Lima* <http://wikimedia.pt/>(351) 925 171 484 *Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. <http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos>* On 12 January 2012 17:52, James Forrester <jdforrester(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > As promised, for Wikimania 2013[0] I hereby announce the Jury[1] to > select the winning bid, and invite everyone to consider putting a > bid[2] together: > > == Jury == > * [[User:80686|Manuel Schneider]] > * [[User:Beria|Béria Lima]] > * [[User:Deror avi|Deror Avi]] > * [[User:Effeietsanders|Lodewijk Gelauff]] > * [[User:Ilario|Ilario Salvatore Valdelli]] > * [[User:Kiril Simeonovski|Kiril Simeonovski]] > * [[User:Peteforsyth|Pete Forsyth]] > * [[User:Philippe|Philippe Beaudette]] > * [[User:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington|Anirudh Bhati]] > * [[User:Theo10011|Theo10011]] > * [[User:Thogo|Thomas Goldammer]] > > There are a further two individuals who I have asked to confirm that > they are happy to serve on the Jury, and who I will add on-wiki if and > when they confirm. > > As in previous Juries, any Wikimania Foundation Board members may act > as (non-voting) advisors to the Jury if they so choose. I know that > Bishakha Datta and Phoebe Ayers have agreed to take on this role, and > other Board members may join if they wish. > > I will serve as a moderator (a neutral non-voting aide to the Jury), > along with another individual who will hopefully confirm that this is > OK with them later today. > > Thank you for everyone who contacted me to nominate themselves, > others, or give suggestions; the suggestions were very helpful, and I > hope the resulting Jury will be a success. > > > == Invitation to bid == > > To re-iterate my comment in November, I'm sure the whole Wikimedia > community would love to see as many good bids as possible. There are > already a few bids[2] on Meta, but if you or your local community are > thinking about putting one in, you need to get it started and in a > reasonable state by the end of 28 January 2012 at the very latest[3]. > > Please also consider passing this message on (and translating it!) for > your wiki's community forum for those that don't read these mailing > lists. > > > Thank you, and good luck to all Bids. > > [0] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2013 > [1] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2013_jury > [2] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2013_bids > [3] - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimania_2013_bids/Timeline > > Yours, > -- > James D. Forrester > jdforrester(a)wikimedia.org | jdforrester(a)gmail.com > [[Wikipedia:User:Jdforrester|James F.]] > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

WikimediaPT January 2012