I really don't want fair use to go totally away, but I agree that it should
be significantly limited. The clause, "Because of our commitment to free
content, this non-free media should not be used when it is reasonably
possible to replace with free media that would serve the same educational
purpose," in Kat Walsh's statement comes to mind. While I have expreseed
concern on-wiki and on-mailing list before about unlicensed images, many
which, if licensed properly, would remained unlicensed and used under fair
use, I think that we should not outright ban unlicensed content used under
fair use. In particular, we should allow very very limited use of non-free
media when it would be practically impossible to use free media -- the media
used in the European History wikibook comes to mind -- and for small textual
quotations. What are everyone else's feelings?
-Iamunknown