Alex R. (WIAL!) wrote:
Would not it be more expedient to ask for a
non-exclusive general license
to be transferred to Wikimedia Foundation
As our pro bono lawyer, we'll trust you about the right way to phrase it.
If "non-exclusive general license" is right, then let's do that!
such a non-exclusive license would
be vast enough to allow the original author to do whatever else they want
with their work
Good, we want this.
while giving Wikimedia enough power to prevent
infringement by third parties and
to create any variations of open source licenses or copyleft licences in the
future.
Good, we want this too.
-- Toby