I can understand the confusion. After some research, I found wikiversity
(also some issues with the name) is a good home for the k-12 curriculum that
I am trying to develop. It has different rules than wikibooks that are open
to different materials.
Hope that helps,
Kathy
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Whitworth [mailto:wknight8111@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:46 PM
To: textbook-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Textbook-l] NPOV and NOR as a local or a global
policiesonWikibooks?
Importance: High
From: "Monahon, Peter B."
<Peter.Monahon(a)USPTO.GOV> Thank you, Andrew,
... for the quick and apparently knowledgeable and well-connected reply.
For your information and feedback, I'm not sure how on my own I'd find
the links you share, and you made many "we have that" comments where
you offered no links.
I didn't provide links to the pages I mentioned, because while they do in
fact exist, they are not particularly well-maintained nor aesthetically
pleasing. The most important method of organization, and the one that is
best maintained, is the bookshelf system, to which there are ample links.
Oh, and by the way, I totally disagree with your
conclusions. Names
matter. While I appreciate that "books" includes "textbooks", I see
it
as "all girl-scouts are girls, but not all girls are girl-scouts". I
see you all opening up a "girl" site, and then saying it's only for
"girl-scouts"! You don't set that?
The fact that you are confused about our name is misfortunately, certainly.
However, your confusion is simply not enough impetus for our entire project
and it's community of volunteer authors and editors to change completely. A
little confusion is a small price to pay for the name recognition that the
"Wikibooks" brand has aquired over the years. Despite your complaints,
wikibooks is not named "Wikilibrary", and it does, in fact, only contain
"books".
And, I'd go to Wikisources because ... I'm
looking for "sources"? "The
free documentations library" means nothing to me.
And Nike's "Just Do It" slogan doesn't mean anything to me, but that
doesnt
make it a less effective advertising tool. Wikisource contains original
source documents, so the name seems pretty appropriate to me.
When Amazon started, I thought, "what a stoopid
name for a book store".
Now, I see they really want to be an "Amazon river on the Internet,
through which everything flows", not just books, but movies, cameras,
personal gear, toys, appliances, and so on. "Books" was just a start,
and now I see "Amazon" as a very savvy name indeed.
Trust me, if you hang around long enough, the name "Wikibooks" will grow on
you too. But let me ask you this: When Amazon first started up, did you send
them an email saying that their name was stupid and that they should change
it?
Perhaps a compiled list page of what's NOT on the
site so (a) there IS
a response to searches within the site and
(b) it clearly tells visitors why not, and where to go?
It's not really our job to point visitors to other people's websites. If you
do a search on google, and it doesnt return any results, it doesnt say
"Sorry we couldn't help you, how about you try your search on MSN instead?"
--Andrew Whitworth
_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows
Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_mig…
n_HM_mini_pcmag_0507