>I like that logo. I think that you should put the new
Wikipedia logo on the cover once it is chosen
tomorrow.
That's a good idea!
>
>There's nothing wrong with the organic chemistry book,
but don't you think it's a bit narcissistic to say
that you have the best organic chemistry textbook on
the web? I think you should change it to something
like the best wiki-produced organic chemistry
textbook, or aspires to be the best organic chemistry
textbook on the web. There is probably a finished
organic chemistry textbook on the web, sorry.
I disagree. I think you're trying to be NPOV which isn't really necessary on
wikibooks. The title may be a bit grand at the moment but once it starts
getting edited by a number of contributors it will soon become the best.
>PS. Can you move your organic chemistry pages to the
Organic chemistry: namespace?
Have namespaces been definitely decided on as the way to go? Because I've
been naming pages on GCSE science "foobar (GCSE science)".
Theresa
__________________________________