Am Dienstag 23 März 2010 12:25:04 schrieb emmanuel(a)engelhart.org:
Le mar 23/03/10 09:53, "Manuel Schneider"
manuel.schneider(a)wikimedia.ch a
écrit:
according to
the discussion I had with Tommi 'tntnet', I have copied the
_old_ status of the ZIM File Format v.4 to a separate page:
http://openzim.org/ZIM_File_Format/4
to keep this information for historical reasons.
The main article
http://openzim.org/ZIM_File_Format
should now be updated to match the changes we did at the last Developers
Meeting.
OK, I now use (so it's tested) all new implemented features and
it works well but part of them are still to be implemented especially
IMO categories and metadatas.
See:
http://openzim.org/Roadmap
I'm not sure if that's good to have a have a documentation which
describes stuff not yet in the standard implementation.
Other topic: about the merge tool, this tool would be
really useful... especially if we have a diff tool too. I think zimpatch
will lost a lot of its added value if zimdiff does not exist.
Regards
Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
dev-l mailing list
dev-l(a)openzim.org
https://intern.openzim.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-l
Categories and metadata are specified. And while the current implementation
lacks direct support for these the implementation is still complete in the way
that it produces compatible zim files.
Bear in mind that the major goal of the openzim project is about the format
and not the implementation.
So I need to document the format as we specified it.
Zimdiff is a good idea. I will add that to my roadmap.
Tommi