On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:10:01 +0200, Manuel Schneider wrote:
Title or Source could help here maybe.
My opinion: * "Title" is a label, we should not base such a automatic mechanism on that. * "Source" could be better but I have a bad feeling. Currently nobody use it, this is not clear for me what should exactly be there (if you have for example a ZIM with WP and WS). We also though about it to be able to provide dynamically generated "go to online version" buttons on articles. Worth, I see now way to guaranty the uniqueness of this value over the different publishers.
If we really need a new entity I would prefer if it was also defined by Dublin Core.
http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/
Identifiere looks useful.
Why not? But "identifier" looks like our ZIM id. It does not seems to have something about "serie" or "collection".
On the other hand I think the information could be retrieved from combined metadata to keep it simpler and easier to understand (human readable):
Like Subject = Wikipedia and Language = en, plus Date should give everything we need.
Emmanuel