The label being grayed out is important. The
outline being closer to
white also helps a lot, but as you said, when it's alone the outline change
is not enough. I think the gray fill is still a little dark, maybe use
#f5f5f5 if you can swing it, but B is getting close.
- Trevor
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:03 PM, May Tee-Galloway <
mgalloway(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I made a few of variations to compare. I think B
works the best because
it doesn't look like you can do anything about it. I greyed the text out,
just like what happens to disabled buttons
<http://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-2.html>.
If A and C stood alone without the standard checkbox, they may not be
as clear that they're disabled. Is there a reason we're using lightgrey
instead of actual value?
[image: Inline image 2]
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Trevor Parscal <
tparscal(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
> I'm confident she will come up with something sensible.
>
> - Trevor
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jared Zimmerman <
> jared.zimmerman(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> Trevor, thanks, thats looking closer. I'll let may weigh in before we
>> finalize.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia
>> Foundation
>> M +1 415 609 4043 \\ @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Trevor Parscal <
>> tparscal(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This is what it looks like when the checkbox uses #ddd instead of "
>>> lightgrey" and the surrounding .mw-ui-checkbox div is 50%
>>> transparent.
>>>
>>> - Trevor
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Kaldari <
>>> rkaldari(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe it's just me, but the new disabled checkbox doesn't look
>>>> disabled to me:
>>>>
https://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-5.html
>>>>
>>>> The normal convention for making a form element disabled is to make
>>>> it faded out (<100% opacity), not giving it a gray fill.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea where this design came from or who is responsible
>>>> for it, but I was wondering if the design team could revisit it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Ryan Kaldari
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Design mailing list
>>>> Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Design mailing list
>>> Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Design mailing list
>> Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
Design(a)lists.wikimedia.org