In which case why didn't we just push the changes with everything else? We must have seen some reason for them to keep out of the typography release... was there?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Forrester jforrester@wikimedia.org Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [Design] Typography update leftovers To: "A list for the design team." design@lists.wikimedia.org
On 28 March 2014 16:58, Jon Robson jdlrobson@gmail.com wrote:
Since the typography update got pushed we are now left with
- Changes to the table of contents
- Changes to thumbnails
- A cleanup of external links.
What should we do with these remaining changes? We could either
- Package them into a single new beta feature
- Package each of them into individual beta features e.g. Vector
table of contents tweaks, Vector thumbnail tweaks, Vector external links tweaks 3) Submit each of these as patches to Gerrit (unless there are any complaints) 4) Throw them away
I think that the image changes should probably be a new BF ("Simpler images" or something), as it needs some thought about changing wikitext (and implementation for non-Vector skins). (Option 2)
The TOC and external link changes should just be made as patches to Vector PDQ (Option 3); really it's going to be very confusing to add, remove, and then re-add these changes for users who are opted-in.
J.