From the Wikimedia researchers' mailing list.
-Sumana
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:05:14 +0100
From: Jodi Schneider <jschneider(a)pobox.com>
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
<wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Fwd: [Air-L] CFP IJHCS Special Issue:
Perspectives on participatory HCI research: Beginnings, middles and
endings
Message-ID:
<CAP5TGf9127XHyZc_S90qPqGu5iy1U6tQWL88madUR9M3MEL2Vg(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
For those doing participatory HCI research, this may be relevant. First
deadline July 31st is an indication of interest. Details below.
-Jodi
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Vines <john.vines(a)newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:48 AM
Subject: [Air-L] CFP IJHCS Special Issue: Perspectives on participatory HCI
research: Beginnings, middles and endings
To: "air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org" <air-l(a)listserv.aoir.org>
Apologies for cross-posting
**************************
Call for Papers: Special Issue of the Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Perspectives on participatory HCI research: Beginnings, middles and endings
http://di.ncl.ac.uk/participation/special-issue/
**************************
Scope
**************************
Participation is a research area of sustained interest to the HCI
community. Traditionally, the term has been used to suggest a democratized
approach to the design of technology that calls for end-user involvement in
the design process. This may vary from researchers inviting specific users
or stakeholders to participate in design workshops, through to long term
engagements with communities to define research questions and study
deployments of new technologies. As HCI is an interdisciplinary field,
however, there are multiple understandings of what participation in
research might mean, from subjects and disciplines such as social science,
participatory and performance arts, international development, and action
research. Beyond these influences, there is also increased pressure from
funding bodies and public institutions to involve a wider spectrum of the
public in academic research. The convergence of these factors has drawn
attention to the potential benefits and challenges, both theoretical and
practical of involving users and the public in HCI research.
While user, citizen or stakeholder participation in design processes can
offer great insight into the applicability of technological interventions
in certain contexts, the HCI community would benefit from critically
reflecting on how participation is planned, managed, and sustained. The
mundane yet still significant details of how participatory HCI research is
performed are rarely documented and discussed by the community. The coming
together of multiple perspectives from different disciplines – some of
which have existing frameworks, some debate the very notion of
participation – provides an opportunity for HCI researchers to reflect
critically on how people are involved in design processes. Specifically, we
call attention to the following three phases of performing participatory
HCI research:
How we begin:
How do researchers establish relationships with communities, participants,
or users and stakeholders prior to commencing participatory research? Who
here determines the research context and the setting it takes place in, or
what research questions are formed? Furthermore, what agendas, skills and
assumptions do researchers bring to a participatory project? Why are
certain participants selected or invited to take part over others?
How we reflex and reflect:
How do researchers reflect upon and manage the complicated processes of
participation and engagement while working with groups or communities? How
are researchers and participants given space to document and reflect upon
the activities they perform and how does this inform the research or design
process throughout? How do we understand our practice when busy doing it
and can we develop strategies to elicit generative reflections on practice
as it is enacted? Furthermore, is it possible to document participatory
work along the way without skewing the process itself?
How we end:
How do researchers determine whether deployments or interventions should be
sustained beyond the formal completion of research, and what are the
practical challenges of leaving a legacy of a participatory project? Is
sustainability or legacy always positive outcome of participatory research,
and are there ways of empirically understanding transformations within a
context beyond the uptake or success of a specific technology or
intervention?
**************************
Topics
**************************
This special issue aims to present a set of high quality, thought
provoking, original research articles that address one or more of these
stages through topics including, but not limited to:
-- Empirical studies collaborating with organizations and communities in
the design or evaluation of new technologies.
-- Studies of participatory HCI that target specific populations or
communities, such as older people, young people, activist groups,
charities, rural communities, among others.
-- Theoretical and conceptual frameworks that unpack the questions and
related problems of participation as a process.
-- Critical reflections on existing and historical examples of
participation in HCI.
-- Strategies for documenting and eliciting reflection from both
researchers and participants engaged in research.
-- Considerations of the ethical, moral and political implications of
designing technologies with communities of users and stakeholders.
-- Interdisciplinary perspectives on participatory HCI research.
-- Case studies discussing experiences of beginning, reflecting on or
sustaining participatory HCI research.
It is anticipated that submissions will tackle at least one stage of
participatory research/design processes in use, as described above, and
that accepted papers will comprise examples from each phase. Papers
addressing theoretical issues will only be considered where the
contribution is exceptional.
**************************
Paper submission
**************************
Authors are requested to contact the guest editors (email:
participation.di@gmail.com<mailto:participation.di@gmail.com>) prior to
making a submission by July 31st 2013 to inform them of their plans to
submit to the special issue. All submissions should be made to the IJHCS
submission system at
http://ees.elsevier.com/ijhcs selecting "SI:
participatory HCI" as the Article Type. Full manuscripts should be
submitted according to the IJHCS Guide for authors and will be blind
refereed.
Articles must be based on original research, although extended versions of
published conference papers may be acceptable if they contain at least 50%
new material. All manuscripts should be submitted online. The IJHCS Guide
for authors and online submission is available at
http://ees.elsevier.com/ijhcs.
**************************
Key dates
**************************
Email guest editors prior to submission: 31st July 2013
Paper due date: 31st August 2013
Review completion date: 15th November 2013 (Notification of 1st
review)
Re-Submission by: 17th January 2014
Final Acceptance: 21st February 2014 (Notification of 2nd review)
Final Version due: 7th April 2014
**************************
Guest Editors
**************************
John Vines, Newcastle University (United Kingdom)
Rachel Clarke, Newcastle University (United Kingdom)
Ann Light, Northumbria University (United Kingdom)
Peter Wright, Newcastle University (United Kingdom)
_______________________________________________
The Air-L(a)listserv.aoir.org mailing list
is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers
http://aoir.org
Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at:
http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers:
http://www.aoir.org/