<quote name="Jon Robson" date="2014-03-10" time="09:22:56
-0700">
To take the definition of the CSS font-family property
" This property
specifies a prioritized list of font family names or generic family names"
[1].
Thus if this change puts a free font first we are thus saying "supporting
free fonts is our priority". I'm not sure any other big sites do this and I
think that in itself is a big fricking deal.
I think regardless of install base and bugs in that free font we send out a
message that might give a lot of attention to free fonts and be a positive
thing for FOSS in general. The font might be downloaded more and that font
might be packaged in OS installs as a result of this.
Restricting ourselves to only free fonts seems like cutting your nose off
to spite your face. As Steven points out we have to think about the world
we live in and that we want our content to be as readable as possible (as
we want to imagine a world in which every single human being can freely
share in the *sum* of all knowledge and to share it helping them read it
plays a big part).
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts
I just want the conversation to be more honest about who's benefiting
here.
There's a lot of changes in Typography Refresh. One of the many is the
font css rule. The majority are changes that do not implicate the
Freeness of anything. The font does. The font change (originally) only
had a benefit to Mac OS users (right?). Now the font change (after
Ryan's amazing work, which should have been done at the beginning) it
includes a benefit for people who will now get Liberation instead of
DejaVu (right?).
So, if my two (right?)'s above are correct, that makes me feel like the
design team only cared about OSX/iOS users before, and only after a LOT
of complaining on the various lists and bugs and such did they put in
the effort to see IF they could improve the experience for non-Apple
products. I find it also corroborated by the request from a Design team
member for access to a Windows computer to do testing on *last week*.
That may or may not be an accurate way to describe the situation,
historically, but that's how the narrative can easily be interpreted and
it is what I'm feeling from these discussions where I'm being told my
preference for not promoting proprietary stuff is "irrational."
Greg
--
| Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
| identi.ca: @greg A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |