Yeah - you're correct if I read correctly, Ziko.
Sorry I've been missing in action on this topic, all :)
And thanks to Sean and the others for getting the ball rolling.
Let me try to lay out the intention here to get your further thoughts
before we kick it off.
Basically our issue is this: We have lots and lots of related PR
material on our public wikis:
- Much of it is on meta in the form of one or more PR committee
portals or categories
- Much of the most significant stuff is on various WP pages,
- Lots of visual collateral (vis identity, logos, you name it) is
swimming around in WM Commons
- The most 'official' Foundation stuff is on
wikimediafoundation.org
- All of it, I'm fairly sure, was created with the very noblest
intentions, and much of it was done with great quality in mind.
If we look towards a healthy future for Wikimedia communications/PR it
would look like this:
- Chapters and 'official' representatives refer to one consistent
location on one wiki for sanctioned, up-to-date communications
materials they can use to conduct media and official outreach.
- media and curious readers can also go to one consistent location for
official, up-to-date, high quality materials to learn about wikimedia,
wikipedia, and the projects.
- Materials would be designed for their situations:
- public audiences with basic questions could read up-to-date info
on a wiki page, reporters could get great easy to understand stats on
the same page
- chapters and officials would have access to high quality templates
and materials they can update and design to do public outreach work.
- The templates could be modified as necessary or translated, then
re-posted in the 'public' spaces or on the chapter's own pages.
- The core visual identity guidelines and 'official' pieces would
not be housed in the same place as the 'public' data, the idea being
that those who are acting in official outreach capacities are the ones
working with the design materials to do the job right.
- The spaces we put stuff 'official' stuff would need to be at least
semi-protected - official material will only be considered as such if
we communicate that it's not going to suffer vandalism or languish
into obsolescence.
There is lots of good stuff across the board on the wikis, but we have
to figure out where it all is - ALL of it - and then make a decision
about what pieces are truly important moving forward. We'll save
those pieces, put them in one place (TBD) and we will have to get rid
of some of the other materials.
I'm not crazy about deleting things, but in our communications world
nothing is more important than accurate and timely information. If
curious media or public google for info and end up at an outdated
photo or schematic on one of our many wikis, then we've got a
problem. That being said, I'm also in favor of archiving important
work - we'll make a museum or something, and very clearly mark it as
such.
So here's how I'm hoping the first stages of this process will unfold
(I need tech help with this :)...
- One - we search for anything and everything related to
communications and PR materials. As already laid out, this could
include:
Templates, PDFs, visual identity stuff, logos, speaking points, press
releases, media clips, how-to PR stuff, backgrounders, Q/A, speeches,
photos (events, portraits, official etc).
- Two - we tag anything that isn't on the WMF wiki with something that
simply says "this page/file may be relocated in the near future to a
central repository of PR/Communications material"
- Three - we link all of those pages onto the temporary Meta page Sean
has created and we determine which stuff is still important, which
needs help, and which as to go away.
- Four - we figure out, from the pieces left, what is pure public
material and what is 'planning' or official use material.
- Five - we will likely create an official space for collaboration of
chapters/WMF staff related to PR on the internal wiki (still TBD)
- Six - we'll build a great space on the WMF wiki that incorporates
the most important WP and WM project PR material into one place - a
place we can watch like a hawk, update vigorously, and translate
liberally. As it makes sense the chapters can also put their relevant
materials here so we can reflect their work and have accurately and
sensibly translated pieces.
Steps one to three are the first stages - it's big work, and it's what
I'd like comproj to focus on for the next few months.
One of the major drivers for this project is related to trademark
polishing and visual identity. Basically the WP globe, other project
logos, and the WMF logos are being used all over the place in a
variety of quasi official, excellent, and in some cases, terrible
ways. We need to find the best ones and fix the worst ones. This
doesn't mean we will take away users' ability to use the trademarks
completely, but it does mean that we need to enforce quality, approved
use and start setting a great example of trademark respect (that's a
significant part of my job).
As you're all probably aware, our trademark is worth a lot of money -
but that's just a small part of the equation. If the trademark gets
routinely abused people will not assume that it's copyrighted.
Wikipedia and WM project content is largely free, but our logos and
trademarks are NOT. We don't want people to A) make money off of
their abuse of our logos when -we- could direct those funds back into
the Foundation and B) miscommunicate their personal, corporate, or
organizational relationship to WMF or WP when in all likelihood they
do not have one. Imagine if a political campaign just used the WP
globe in an ad or on their website because their candidate has a WP
page? Perception of NPOV is right out the window.
That's another big topic :) But I wanted to raise it here because
it's a major part of this clean-up initiative. Going forward I want
to be much more available to work with volunteers, chapters, and
outside organizations in approving use of the WP or other project
logos. I also want to provide ALL of our design materials at the
foundation to approved parties so they can exude the same look and
feel as us - because we trust those who have the permission to use our
marks.
That is one loooong email, especially coming from a north american-
based foundation on labor day :) We can discuss some or all of these
details further (I promise I'll stay on top of the list). I know some
of you will have caveats or cautions about this, I want to hear them.
We can set a 'start date' in the next few days I hope, and start by
focussing on pointing our scanners on meta, WP, WMF wiki, and another
other wikis where PR materials can be found.
Can someone develop a cross-wiki reference tag to get us started?
Again - this tag should -only- be used for pages/material that are NOT
on the WMF wiki. That stuff is doing official work right now, we
don't want to imply it is questionable (I'm pretty sure I've got all
the stuff there under control).
Looking forward to hearing from you - this project is a critical step
for our long-term communications strategy - it is by no means lower-
shelf business. It's hard, necessary work for a wiki organization that
has demonstrated a huge capacity for creativity and creation!
Thanks!
--
Jay Walsh
Head of Communications
WikimediaFoundation.org
+1 (415) 839 6885 x 609
On Aug 12, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Jay,
If I understand you correctly, your vision of future Wikimedia PR is
(1) not that one finds a lot of elements at Meta/Commons, but well
presented and easy to find, to put them together, but that (2) someone
who needs materials in his language can order a localized version from
Wikimedia, in a well concepted and performanced piece, unified visual
identity and so on?
Ziko
2008/8/12 Jay Walsh <jwalsh(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
Thanks for this, Sean. I'm sure there have
been other efforts to
make
this happen before, but I feel like we can create a solid, long-term
plan from here and stick to it. Ultimately I don't want to use meta
as a storage place - I just want to find everything that's out there,
figure out what's still relevant and then put relevant, timely
materials on the Foundation wiki - particularly so the chapters can
use it.
I'll also be developing a more robust space on the internal wiki that
will contain design-ready, high quality templates (for business
cards,
documents, etc). Some of these will use the trademark, so they
shouldn't be broadly available.
And it's worth mentioning that this is one of the reasons to find all
the materials on meta/commons and put it in one place. A lot of
those
pieces are basically offering up use of the trademark with little or
no regard for vis-identity.
So bear in mind this isn't about creating a defacto place where all
of
these things will live. This is about creating a temporary space
where we can look and decide what is still relevant, what needs to go
away, and then where the good pieces should be hosted for the
longterm.
This would be a big help for me and for the Foundation. Creating a
long-term plan for housing approve, accurate, high-quality
communications products and templates will go a long way to
supporting
our overall communications objectives.
Thanks!
--
Jay Walsh
Head of Communications
WikimediaFoundation.org
+1 (415) 839 6885 x 609
On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
Hello all,
A project to get involved in:
<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/PR_material_cleanup>
"An effort has been started to bring together all the PR and
communications material out there around various wikis and other
locations in one organised space here on meta. It is being loosely
co-ordinated by Sean Whitton and involves ComCom, ComProj and Jay
Walsh. At the moment the project is being planned on this page,
which
you are invited to pitch in and edit (discussion should take place
on
the ComProj list). When this planning is complete, things will go
ahead per the below plan (which of course can be changed).
The idea is to have a plan and brutally work away at it in order to
get this done in a reasonable timeframe. By focussing on just
PR/communications stuff, we should be able to avoid drifting off and
should be able to finish this project. So, once this page has been
open for planning for a week or so, we'll just get going."
Interested? Go and sign up and contribute to the skeleton and
plan :)
Thanks,
Sean
_______________________________________________
ComProj mailing list
ComProj(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
_______________________________________________
ComProj mailing list
ComProj(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj
--
Ziko van Dijk
NL-Silvolde
_______________________________________________
ComProj mailing list
ComProj(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/comproj