Erik Moeller, 21/05/2013 19:40: AFAICS, they also: 1) collapsed the button that allows you to set the license of an image of yours, which is now hidden below a "more" link in the metadata section that was moved outside the screen (or did this happen before? certainly after 2010) ; 2) removed any UI path to the advanced search and to the search for free/CC images, so that now you can find them only on the advanced search, by knowing its URL: http://www.flickr.com/search/advanced/ ; 3) less importantly, hid under that mysterious triple-ball "ellipsis" button the option to find high resolution versions of the image, consistent with a similar regression in the interface of Google Plus compared to PicasaWeb. I found also some bugs, at least for Linux, which make (2) worse. So, what's the future of CC on Flickr? http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/ shows only 260M CC images: there were already 220M in 2011 if I read news correctly; only 60M are free. 75 % of the times I ask a user to put an image under cc-by-sa they choose -nc-nd because "it was the first option" (and some of course "what, isn't Wikipedia non-commercial?!). Is this the price to pay to Instagram, Tumblr and Facebook? Will the unusable&pretty-fication help bring more people to an environment where they may meet free knowledge, or will free knowledge just be sacrificed? It's unclear to me what's going on. Nemo