On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com> wrote:
Matthew Roth, 23/05/2013 17:31:
    So, what's the future of CC on Flickr?
    http://www.flickr.com/__creativecommons/

    <http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/> shows only 260M CC images:
    there were already 220M in 2011 if I read news correctly; only 60M
    are free. 75 % of the times I ask a user to put an image under
    cc-by-sa they choose -nc-nd because "it was the first option" (and
    some of course "what, isn't Wikipedia non-commercial?!).
    Is this the price to pay to Instagram, Tumblr and Facebook?


There are already lots of problems with Facebook (and various other
social networks) and free licenses. See this analysis here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal_and_Community_Advocacy/CC-BY-SA_on_Facebook

Yes but there's a difference between that and forcing good sources of free knowledge like Flickr to drop this aspect

agreed :)
 
, which Facebook never had. :) (If this is what's happening.)
Ah, of course they also removed the option to have unlimited uploads: only current pro users can keep it, for the others there are only expensive storage plans.

Nemo



--

Matthew Roth
Global Communications Manager
Wikimedia Foundation
+1.415.839.6885 ext 6635
www.wikimediafoundation.org
http://blog.wikimedia.org/