Agreed.
- White Cat
On 7/2/07, Bryan Tong Minh <bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The fact that we have the confusing Wikimedia in our name, is actually
an advantage. If you want to request author's permission for freely
licensing an image, they will immediately associate the name with
Wikipedia, a name that everybody knows. The chance of success is so
much greater when saying "Wikimedia Commons" than "Commons".
Bryan
On 7/2/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As of Monday, 2 July, 2007, 08:27 (UTC/GMT),
there are currently 10,471
articles and 2,680 files on Meta.
As of Monday, 2 July 2007, (UTC/GMT), there are currently 63,232
galleries
and 1,603,598 files on Wikimedia Commons.
- White Cat
On 7/2/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps meta can be merged to commons? A daring idea perhaps but we
could
more than handle it. There are so few galleries
and articles on Meta. A
"new" commons namespace can be dedicated to that import.
- White Cat
On 7/2/07, Pedro Sanchez < pdsanchez(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/2/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Commons is the "common" place for wikimedia projects for media
(images,
> > > video files, audio files, pdf files). It may be further expanded
to
include
> > > interwiki templates and other goodies when there is Mediawiki
support
for
and we
>
(commons) shouldn't be restricted to multimedia.
>
And Meta is the "common" place for discusions and coordinations...
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l