On 03/07/07, Ayelie <ayelie.at.large(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
More to the point, all Wikisource material has
"language" as a
fundamental attribute, which isn't really applicable here.
The equivalent fragmentation in Commons would presumably be, oh,
something like -
image.commons
video.commons
audio.commons
Where would animations fit in? They aren't movies per se, but neither are
they strictly images.
I dunno. Maybe we could have month-long flamewars over whether
image.commons contained *just* "traditional" images, or upstart modern
dialects like animations ;-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk