On 23/01/2008, Rama Rama <ramaneko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hence, with a very little concession to the
standard to which
professional photographers are accustomed,
Accustomed to what appears to be a non standard practice?
Yes, who in the world would do that, apart the BBC,
BBC credits AP and getty
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7204570.stm
CNN,
Nope mostly credit Getty and AP
the Times
nope
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premier_league/arsenal/artiā¦
, the
Washington Post,
At last one that actually does so.
and bleeding everybody ?
How many counter examples do I have to provide
The problem is
that we are making the project in the real world and
thus have to understand that by allowing instance on Mr doe we also
end up having to allow mr
wetriffs.com.
We don't *have* to do anything.
You start offering caption guarantees and we will
And how would that be a problem ?
Generally it is not considered a good idea to advertise porn sites in
your image captions. "Prussian Blue courtesy of all Jews should hang
inc" isn't even going to be legal in quite a number of countries.
--
geni