Andre Engels wrote on Mon Aug 27 12:19:32 UTC 2007:
2007/8/27, Florian Straub <Flominator at gmx.net>:
What's exactly the difference?
The reviewer in {{Flickr}} has checked the usability of the image for Commons - whether it is a good picture, what it shows, etcetera. The reviewer in {{flickrreview}} has checked the copyright status of the picture - what license it is under.
I have to add two remarks here:
- The current situation is that the 'reviewer' parameter is not shown
at all, which I think is also not the intention. I would have liked to correct it myself, but the template is protected and I am not an admin any more.
- The images from FlickrLickr (which are the ones that have this
image) are pre-selected on having the desired license (CC-BY). I think it would not be a bad idea to re-add the {{flickrreview}} template, but with the flickrreviewer specified Eloquence or FlickrLickr rather than the FlickrLickr-reviewer.
What is the reviewer in Flickr for anyway? If the picture is good, you'll see it. If not, request it for deletion like any other one.
Regards,
Flo