"Gregory Maxwell" <gmaxwell(a)gmail.com> wrote on Friday, August 24, 2007 7:10 PM: Then it should be request for deletion and "subst"-ing {{flickr}} and some {{if}}s. Regards, Flo

Gregory Maxwell wrote: We could use html tags (eg. <span class='reviewer'>) and parse the html page instead.

On 8/25/07, Platonides &lt;Platonides(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: I still don't see why the {{flickrreview}} should be included this way. It breaks the entire Flickrreview system. '''Only''' admins and [[Commons:Flickr images/reviewers|designated users]] are allowed to fill in the flickrreview tag. They are absolutely not the same as the reviewer parameter to {{Flickr}}. I think it should be removed from the Flickr template. Bryan

2007/8/27, Florian Straub &lt;Flominator(a)gmx.net&gt;et>: The reviewer in {{Flickr}} has checked the usability of the image for Commons - whether it is a good picture, what it shows, etcetera. The reviewer in {{flickrreview}} has checked the copyright status of the picture - what license it is under. I have to add two remarks here: * The current situation is that the 'reviewer' parameter is not shown at all, which I think is also not the intention. I would have liked to correct it myself, but the template is protected and I am not an admin any more. * The images from FlickrLickr (which are the ones that have this image) are pre-selected on having the desired license (CC-BY). I think it would not be a bad idea to re-add the {{flickrreview}} template, but with the flickrreviewer specified Eloquence or FlickrLickr rather than the FlickrLickr-reviewer. -- Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels

2007/8/27, Bryan Tong Minh &lt;bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com&gt;om>: I guess it should just be an extra field in the table that is created. Maybe with a text like 'selected by' or 'chosen by'. Problem is that the FlickrLickr reviewer fulfils a role most similar to the uploader for other images, and that's part of the page that we (with good reason) cannot change. -- Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels

"Bryan Tong Minh" &lt;bryan.tongminh(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:59:52 +0200: What about the current version with the sentence below {{information}} maybe put inside a nice box? Regards, Flo -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser

On 8/27/07, Florian Straub &lt;Flominator(a)gmx.net&gt; wrote: Your answer is right there :) The reviewer section is for people who have reviewed the image through the FlickrLickr system, which means they were pre-selected according to license and then somebody went through and chose the useful ones, which were then uploaded to Commons. This means that the person "reviewing" them was not in fact checking the licenses, as that had been done automatically when the images were set aside for human review. Thus there will be two "reviewers", the person who chose the picture to upload and added the information/categories/etc., and the person/bot/system that checked the license. -- Ayelie ~Editor at Large

Florian Straub wrote: [[User:FlickrLickr|Chosen by]] [[User:Foo]]