2007/8/27, Florian Straub Flominator@gmx.net:
"Bryan Tong Minh" bryan.tongminh@gmail.com wrote on Sat, 25 Aug 2007 21:08:43 +0200:
I still don't see why the {{flickrreview}} should be included this way. It breaks the entire Flickrreview system. '''Only''' admins and [[Commons:Flickr images/reviewers|designated users]] are allowed to fill in the flickrreview tag. They are absolutely not the same as the reviewer parameter to {{Flickr}}. I think it should be removed from the Flickr template.
What's exactly the difference?
The reviewer in {{Flickr}} has checked the usability of the image for Commons - whether it is a good picture, what it shows, etcetera. The reviewer in {{flickrreview}} has checked the copyright status of the picture - what license it is under.
I have to add two remarks here: * The current situation is that the 'reviewer' parameter is not shown at all, which I think is also not the intention. I would have liked to correct it myself, but the template is protected and I am not an admin any more. * The images from FlickrLickr (which are the ones that have this image) are pre-selected on having the desired license (CC-BY). I think it would not be a bad idea to re-add the {{flickrreview}} template, but with the flickrreviewer specified Eloquence or FlickrLickr rather than the FlickrLickr-reviewer.