2008/11/4 Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org>rg>:
2008/11/3 geni <geniice(a)gmail.com>om>:
Not what I meant. In this case the spirt is to
prevent GFDL manuals
being relicensed. Eric's interpretation would allow for sites like
scribd (which does have GFDL licensed manuals on it) to be considered
MMCs.
[ ] Site allows anyone to overwrite an existing document
[ ] Site keeps a version history of all changes
You are arguing that this counts as prominent facilities for anybody
to edit those works? How does this differ from a site that allows
edited versions to be uploaded under new names by anyone but no
overwrites?
--
geni