On 26 June 2014 15:15, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If anyone is misusing the list today, Fae.... It's
not appropriate to accuse
Gerard of "following" you to Commons, nor to accuse him of trolling or of
making accusations (or "slurs") he has not made. Nor is it polite to
describe widely offered criticism as fiction, parody or bizarre. It'd be
great if you could participate in the discussion without resorting to
attacking other posters.
Hi Nathan,
Interesting feedback, thanks. Certainly it was inappropriate to make
an accusation that Gerard followed me to Commons. It probably is a
coincidence that this is the first time I can recall that he has ever
replied to an email of mine on this list.
I am unsure how to interpret your feedback that I am misusing this
list, against the following, could you explain a little further
please?
1. "The Wikimedia Foundation lawyers have said that it is OK to host"
- I would really appreciate a link to this legal advice, as it solves
the problem entirely, as we can use it were there any future legal
case. A similar claim was made during the RFC but nobody was able to
supply a link to evidence at that time.
2. " Commons admins: You're wrong, now go away and get teh Israli
government to disclaim the copyright they say they don't have.
Reasonable people: But they can't!"
- If this was not intended to be a parody, could someone provide a
link to these statements, or where it was agreed that Commons admins
are not reasonable people.
3. "When the party or parties who you INSIST have a copyright deny
that they do like the Israeli government does, your whole argument
becomes a puddle."
- Could someone provide a link to where I "insisted" in this way?
4. "I have said nothing about the Israeli government, neither has
anyone else in this thread."
- I may have missed something, but my statement here was true from
what I can see of posts on this thread.
Thanks,
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae