2007/2/10, geni geniice@gmail.com:
On 2/10/07, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see what's odd about that. It's a work, copyrighted by you,
under
CC-BY-SA, and based on a public domain work. It's no different than the
same
situation would have been if the music had been not 51 but 300 years
old.
And little different than the same situation where you had not put it
under
CC-BY-SA.
But CC-By-SA is claiming the film is a derivative of the sound recording despite film and sound being seperate under uk law. So even though I have made no changes to the music CC-By-SA is trying to claim it is under copyright again because is it is part of a film.
No, it does not claim the music is under copyright, only the film is under copyright. You are allowed to use non-copyrighted work in copyrighted work.