On 2/10/07, Andre Engels <andreengels@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see what's odd about that. It's a work, copyrighted by you, under
> CC-BY-SA, and based on a public domain work. It's no different than the same
> situation would have been if the music had been not 51 but 300 years old.
> And little different than the same situation where you had not put it under
> CC-BY-SA.

But CC-By-SA is claiming the film is a derivative of the sound
recording despite film and sound being seperate under uk law. So even
though I have made no changes to the music CC-By-SA is trying to claim
it is under copyright again because is it is part of a film.