On 16.09.2010 13:46, David Gerard wrote:
On 16 September 2010 11:19, Robin Schwabcontact@robinschwab.ch wrote:
Why being so dogmatic? I agree that free software is a must for core components of our project for strategic reasons. However for secondary components such as an image viewer I see no such strategic reasons.
Because content that requires a proprietary viewer is considered problematic. This is why Commons requires free formats.
I'm not talking about allowing content in a proprietary file format. All those panoramics are jpg files. I only propose to put a proprietary software on our servers giving the user an alternative way to see those jpg files.
Regards
Robin