On 16.09.2010 13:46, David Gerard wrote:
On 16 September 2010 11:19, Robin
Schwab<contact(a)robinschwab.ch> wrote:
Why being so dogmatic? I agree that free software
is a must for core
components of our project for strategic reasons. However for secondary
components such as an image viewer I see no such strategic reasons.
Because content that requires a proprietary viewer is considered
problematic. This is why Commons requires free formats.
I'm not talking about allowing content in a proprietary file format. All
those panoramics are jpg files. I only propose to put a proprietary
software on our servers giving the user an alternative way to see those
jpg files.
Regards
Robin