Ok.... So why don't I pop in and explain my thoughts and therefor my
actions. As I've said about 100 times, I'll happily explain anything I do.
So here goes:
Initially it all started with a user making note on another admin's talk
page about [[Image:Masturbating
man2.JPG<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Masturbating_man2.JPG&g…
being deleted. I checked and the file was deleted by User:Szwedzki with the
message of "amateur pr0n". Now I'm a fan of deleting penis porn as much as
the next admin, but as the original user pointed out to me - this file was
in use. The base logic (or Rule, if you will) behind deleting penis porn is
that it will never be used, so there for it is out of scope. This image
being used, makes it in scope - As there was no {{Personality rights}} or
License issues - there should be no valid reason to delete the image. So I
restored it. At this point I left User:Szwedzki a note about it was
probably just a mistake (AGF and all). We've all made mistakes.
About an hour later (I believe) that same user posted on my talk page that
[[Image:Semen2.jpg <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Semen2.jpg>]]
had also been deleted. I saw that there was a proper DR (not that I agreed
with how it had been handled, but the proccess is there for a reason), and
directed the users to [[COM:UDEL]]. The user posted his request there
explaining the rationel, which included the fact that the image in question
had been used for nearly 2 years (give or take). I supported the
undeletion, along with Johnny-mt and Nilfanion. All 3 of us are admins.
Rocket000 then restored the image. Yes, the UDEL was completed extremly
quickly - but the image was (again) previously in use and no outstanding
issues other than people didn't like the content.
Shortly there after I noticed that Rocket000 has restored the image a second
time, which I thought was unusual so I investigated. I found that Szwedki
has deleted the image with the commentary "funny undeletion:)))" along
with leaving
a message on a closed UDEL (
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/…)3374657).
I also saw that Szwedki has deleted 3 other files recently and all of
them were restored. I found on his talk page that after my note of concern,
User:Multichill and User:Rocket000 had left notes of concern.
Seeing is how Swedski had been idle for the last two weeks, I assumed there
was something very wrong - like his account had been comprimised.
Regardless of if his account had been comprimised, he was having a bad day,
or simply was going rogue - I thought it was best to shut things down. So I
proceeded to block Szwedki for a week. Yes, I know that is fairly long for a
first block - but I'll fully admin I'm a bit heavy handed with the blocks.
Though my thought proccess is that admins should have less leeway for
purposeful abuse than normal users. Deletions of any image cause alot of
damage - CommonsDelinker sees to that. Additionally, I know a block can't
hold an admin, we can just turn it right off. I was hoping that a block
would act as a wake up call since posts on the talk user's talk page didn't
seem to be getting any response. I don't want to see a good admin get
desysop'd because they had a bad day, or they were misunderstanding how
things worked.
-Jon
[[Commons:User:ShakataGaNai]]
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 9:57 AM, szwedzki <suidisz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:25:18 +0200
ABF <wikipediabaeren(a)gmx.de> wrote:
I agree to your deletions, but not to the way you
did it. We have a huge
dump of shitty porn images out of scope on commons noone needs. But if
there is a undeletion request closed by an admin you and every other
sysop will have to respect this decission.
So, this admin didn't respect rules - 20 hours it's too short for any
decission.
If you feel like its wrong
simply start a new deletion request.
Good idea.
Your block seems a bit hard & long
to me, so if you really promise to follow our deletion guidelines
infeauture I belive it'll be no problem to unblock.
OK. Situation needs a debate (BAR?). Thank you.
regards
szwedzki
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l