Just to note that the specific image I cited at the start of this
thread has been fixed now. I think it would be helpful if we could
have a scrape of links between images to see if there are any other
blatant violations.
On 26/10/2007, Andre Engels <andreengels(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2007/10/25, Magnus Manske
<magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>om>:
Maybe you (or I) misunderstand. I'm saying
that the entire new work
has to be released under GFDL, and not as PD, because it is a
derivative work of GFDL data.
Yeah, either you misunderstood me or I misunderstood you, but in
effect we seem to be arguing the same case.
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
Commons-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l