Just to note that the specific image I cited at the start of this thread has been fixed now. I think it would be helpful if we could have a scrape of links between images to see if there are any other blatant violations.
On 26/10/2007, Andre Engels andreengels@gmail.com wrote:
2007/10/25, Magnus Manske magnusmanske@googlemail.com:
Maybe you (or I) misunderstand. I'm saying that the entire new work has to be released under GFDL, and not as PD, because it is a derivative work of GFDL data.
Yeah, either you misunderstood me or I misunderstood you, but in effect we seem to be arguing the same case.
-- Andre Engels, andreengels@gmail.com ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
Nilfanion