But. there's no reason why the two should be technically separated. It's
already been practically divided by categories. It's not considered
unnecessary faff just by techs; any pragmatic person would agree.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:03 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 1 February 2011 23:41, Gnangarra
Why would these images even need a wiki, these
images are the property of
the foundation if they are such a big concern to Commons Community, (I've
been on common for a few years and was not aware of real concerns about
those images) then the Foundation should address the issue.
There have been slight concerns over the years, with a small number of
people greatly concerned that Commons carries non-free WMF utility
images as well as the free media.
This is a reasonable viewpoint to hold. But no, I agree with you -
mostly people aren't that worried.
I note only that technically it would be feasible, the idea would just
be considered unnecessary faff by most of the people who'd be involved
in actually doing the work.
Commons-l mailing list