Hoi, I really think that you should learn a bit more about trademarks. Your assume that it is acceptable for graphics that identify an organisation or a project to be used by everyone. This is not the case. Thanks, GerardM
2009/6/5 Abigor abigor@forgotten-beauty.com
Hello,
This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving a good example.
I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo for pikiwiki for example can easy be released under cc-by or cc-by-sa and that would also give a example for other company's how they should license there logo's and photo's.
cc license can be used on Commons without problems.. But how can a organisation support free media and upload there own material under a non free license..
Huib
Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor msn: Abigor@forgotten-beauty.com
Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l